Alien: Earth

Set in the year 2120, Alien: Earth opens with the USCSS Maginot on its way back from a 65-year mission to gather alien specimens—and not just any alien specimens, but, seemingly, the most cunningly lethal it can find—when the inevitable happens and some of them get loose, causing the ship to crash into the city of New Siam. While the Maginot is owned by the Weyland-Yutani corporation, New Siam is owned by one of its rivals, Prodigy (the entire solar system, at this point, is divided up between five mega-corporations), so it’s Prodigy emergency teams who go into the wreckage. Prodigy, meanwhile, have been working on a new technology, the uploading of human consciousness into synthetic bodies. At the moment, only children’s minds are adaptable enough to make the change, so a handful of kids with terminal illnesses have been uploaded into new, adult-sized and super-resilient bodies. One of them, the group’s “big sister” Wendy, has been keeping an eye on her older brother in the outside world, and sees him entering the crash site in his role as a medic. She persuades Prodigy’s founder and CEO, the “boy genius” Kavalier, to send the kidroids (not what they’re called in the show) in, as a test of their abilities. Kavalier agrees, and soon sees an upside: they can get him the alien specimens before Weyland-Yutani reclaim them. It needs no degree in science fiction to know this is a bad idea.

Of course, one of the specimens loose on the Maginot is the Alien xenomorph. (There’s also a handy supply of its eggs, as well as the usual array of face-huggers in jars.) But, just as one swallow does not a summer make, neither does one xenomorph make this, necessarily, a real part of the Alien franchise. My take on the series is that, while it would have made an interesting, even quite original, SF show without the xenomorph, bringing one in, and calling the show Alien: Earth, sets up expectations it doesn’t deliver on. In short, it’s a good SF series, but it’s not an Alien series.

Some things are definitely Alien. The look and feel of the original film has been reproduced, particularly in the USCSS Maginot, which is pretty much identical to the first film’s Nostromo, complete with wildly outdated-looking computer equipment (green VDUs, chunky keyboards, and vast, room-sized arrays of winking lights). But the xenomorphs themselves aren’t really central to the plot. (I even began to suspect the show was written with one many-tentacled eye on easily removing the Alien elements, just in case it wasn’t green-lit for the franchise.)

One thing that makes the xenomorphs themselves expendable is that there are a host of other, new alien lifeforms, all with icky and disturbing ways of infecting, consuming, or parasitising human beings. And one of them, the eyeball-thing that spends most of its time planted in the head of an eerily determined-looking sheep, is by far the most memorable. (And one that doesn’t get fully explored. The “boy genius” Kavalier at one point wonders what it might say if planted in the head of a human rather than a sheep, but never gets round to trying it out. This, to me, would clearly be the focus of a second series.)

But there’s another thing that spends the show elbowing the xenomorphs aside in their traditional role of apex predator. In Aliens, the Weyland-Yutani corporation want the xenomorphs because of their potential use as a weapons technology. But here, Prodigy have already developed something far superior in the bodies of its hybrids: they’re super-strong, super-resilient, and have super-sharp perceptions. They’re already the perfect killers (except that they’re currently inhabited by the consciousnesses of children, who of course don’t want to kill—but that changes as the show goes on). At one point, Wendy, who has developed a bond with the xenomorphs (to the extent that she can basically use them as attack dogs, thus removing the element of conscienceless chaos that made them so frightening in the first two movies), starts to explain what she sees in them. As she did so, I was so primed for her to echo Ash’s speech in the first film (about them being “a survivor, unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality”), that when she merely said “They’re honest,” it felt like a missed opportunity—or, perhaps, an acknowledgement that, in this show, the xenomorphs don’t stand for much.

Ahh, they make sounds like dolphins, how cute.

The show doesn’t tie in with what, for me, is one of the key thematic strands of the Alien series, which is all about just how viscerally, weirdly biological our bodies are, and how vulnerable that makes us to all sorts of violation by infection, parasitism, or weird varieties of impregnation. But where Alien: Earth does tie into the Alien series is in its exploration of the extremes of capitalism. One way of viewing the original film is that it’s about the ultimate abuse of workers: they’re already having to work lightyears from home and sacrifice years of life they could have lived with their families, but now they’re being forced (under pain of receiving no shares at all—and presumably this is the only form of salary available in a corporate-dominated future) to put their lives in mortal danger. In Alien, workers are expendable. The ultimate corporate man in that film is Ash, the android, who will do anything the company wants, even if it means the deaths of his fellow crew-members. In Alien: Earth, we have all sorts of compromised beings, from the Ash-like synthetic Kirsh to the cyborg Morrow, who has become the perfect company man not because he’s had his humanity removed, but because he owes so much of his body to Weyland-Yutani that he has no choice but to act as it demands. (As he says to Wendy’s brother at one point: “There’s always a price when the corporation gives you something. Do you know what it is?” “Everything,” says the brother. “Everything,” Morrow rejoins, “doesn’t begin to cover it.”)

The only glimpse we get of ordinary workers along the lines of the “space-truckers” from Alien are the first-responder security guards/soldiers. One of them says: “We got a good thing going here. We’re alive. We get paid.” But in a tone that implies you can’t really ask much more than that. No freedom, self-expression, or security, just survival. In this ultra-corporate world, the only truly free people are the CEOs that sit atop those five mega-companies. Everyone else has to do what they’re told.

The child-robot hybrids are the essence of this clash between corporate beings and human beings. Their bodies are entirely owned by the Prodigy corporation. And after uploading their consciousnesses into these bodies, the company renames them, as though to underline its ownership. (Later, the “boy genius” Kavalier tells them straight that they’re not human beings or employees, but “show models”: company property.) But, because they’re kids, and not yet worn down by the corporate grind, they resist—and that, really, is the main story being told here, not the survival-by-the-skin-of-your-teeth narrative of all other Alien movies.

As a standalone SF series, I’d still, perhaps, be tempted to criticise the often over-mannered acting. It’s understandable for the kids to act like kids, and the synthetics to act a little strange (Kirsh’s constantly talking just a little too quietly, for instance), but elsewhere normal people act so mannered it started to become distracting. In a non-Alien series, I might think the show was making a point about how differently people might behave in the future, but the Alien franchise needs its people to act realistically to highlight the contrast between their ordinary humanity and the extreme survival situations they’re faced with. Here, I found myself feeling mostly irritated by the characters, so I didn’t care so much when they died. (There were exceptions. I think Adrian Edmondson was excellent, channeling the paternalistic menace of late-career Charles Dance.)

But also, I’m not sure the show really had something it was trying to say. Occasionally in the last episode, someone would say something that felt like it was one of those lines that sums up the theme of everything that had gone before. For instance, when the cyborg Morrow is fighting the synthetic Kirsh, he says “In the end, Man will always win. It’s a question of will.” Then he seems to win, but there’s a switch-around, so that obviously wasn’t the theme of this show. I was left feeling the show hadn’t really focussed on one particular theme or meaning. This, combined with the fact there were no major twists (you can predict the ending from the beginning, except for it being even more simplistic than you might expect), was one thing that made me feel that, even as a non-Alien show, it wasn’t entirely in the top notch of SF shows.

Still, it had some good ideas, and some relevance to our times (in its examination of a world ruled by a handful of over-indulged tech-trillionaires, for instance). I do think the Alien franchise needs to switch to this sort of long form TV series to really do more than merely attempt to reproduce the first movie. As I said in my review of Alien: Romulus, what I’d like is much more of a political thriller, focusing on the xenomorphs as the subject of industrial espionage, with plenty of corporate shenanigans and the occasional gruesome death, but I’m happy to watch something like Alien: Earth, which at least tried to do something new. Frankly, the first two movies of the Alien franchise are pretty much perfect, so it’s hard to imagine anything equalling them, but I’ll continue to watch (and no doubt criticise) anything that makes the attempt.

And I will watch the eyeball-thing when it gets its own series.

Comments (10)

  1. Aonghus Fallon says:

    This is all really interesting, Murray. I watched around three episodes. I think Disney nailed the look of the original films (they may even have used the original score?) but by the third episode I felt I was watching a feat of mimicry without any of the philosophical underpinnings – we are talking about Disney, after all – and so I stopped. I don’t think there’s any need to labour the irony of a global corporation producing a series about evil corporations* but would point out another: I always reckoned there was a fundamental discrepancy between what a xenomorph looked like and what it was supposedly capable of doing. A xenomorph is large and ungainly in appearance with an oversized head, yet we’re constantly told they’re super fast etc. Showing this presents its own challenges and in the episodes I saw, any killings by Xenomorphs happened largely off-screen and we only saw the perpetrators in fits and glimpses. Rather than building up tension this made them seem peripheral to the main story, just like you say.

    * not sure if it was intentional but I got the impression that in the original films, the corporations were the alien’s natural adversary due to their similarities (ie, being ruthless predators who destroyed or consumed anything that they encountered)

  2. Murray Ewing says:

    Glad to hear I’m not the only one who found the series a bit empty. (It seems to have received rave reviews, though I haven’t checked to see what people have thought of the series now it’s over.)

    I never really thought about the xenomorph’s head before, but you’re right, it is ungainly. I presume it’s needed to house the muscles that power that inner set of jaws that shoot out. (The SF painter Mervyn Grant criticised those jaws for not being at right angles to the outer jaw, which would make them more effective.) Maybe it’s an evolutionary adaptation: you can’t help stopping and thinking, “What the hell is up with its head?” by which time it’s killed you…

    1. Aonghus Fallon says:

      I guess the first movie was a horror movie? So you basically had the SF equivalent of a group being stalked by a monster in a haunted house with the emphasis on the alien’s frightening appearance. It didn’t need to be particularly fast or agile as this was all unfolding in a confined space. It just needed to unkillable.

      Thinking about it, quite a few monsters aren’t very light on their feet (e.g. Frankenstein, the Mummy etc) but still get the job done.

  3. Murray Ewing says:

    Apparently Ridley Scott showed everyone The Texas Chainsaw Massacre to give them some idea of what the film was going to be like. The guy who wields the chainsaw in that film is hardly light on his feet!

    1. Aonghus Fallon says:

      Figures!

  4. Andrew Kawam says:

    I agree that I also found Alien:Earth to be far more middling than I was hoping for it to be. I think it’s a classic example of good ideas with bad to mediocre execution. I appreciated how it was integrating more of the capitalist/class-based political drama side of things, how it made some very interesting choice son editing the memories of the characters together, and filled in some bits about the biology of the Xenomorph that were crucially missing, but it just felt far too rote, predictable, and pandering too much to schlockiness to be as consistently good as it deserved to be (but I have to agree that the alien eyeball creature is genius).

    And again, I hate to sound like a broken record, but Raised by Wolves did so many of the themes and that Alien: Earth tried to do so so so much better and with so much more originality and emotional depth (in fact, there were times when I outright wondered if Alien: Earth had just attempted to copy some ideas from Raised by Wolves so that the capitalist farts at Disney could lure in RbW with a shallow substitute), and made much bolder and more bizarre plot twists and turns that for all their unpredictability were/are clearly based on an intricately pre-planned series mythology that I can only compare to Gene Wolfe’s Solar Cycle in all its layers. It’s far more worth your time than Alien: Earth. Obviously I hope I’m not being annoying at this point; if I am I apologize.

  5. Murray Ewing says:

    I almost feel that one of the dangers of continuing the Alien franchise is that people will fill in more and more details about the Xenomorph’s biology—it’s the sheer incomprehensibility of it, the constant surprises, in the first two films that makes it so scary. But that could easily be changed by someone with really good ideas.

    Thanks for the reminder about Raised by Wolves. You’ve convinced me to watch it! (I recently gave The Nightingale a watch and it was, as you said, a tough watch, but certainly one that justified that toughness.)

    1. Aonghus P. Fallon says:

      There’s a film version of ‘The Nightingale’? I must check it out….

      1. Murray Ewing says:

        This was an original film, not based on a novel, in case you’re thinking it is. It’s this one Andrew recommended:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nightingale_(2018_film)

        1. Aonghus Fallon says:

          I might actually have seen this! I was in error, anyway – I was thinking of ‘The Sparrow’.

Leave a Reply to Aonghus Fallon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *